Back to all articles

IPO Pipeline and NEPSE Blocked: How Market Closures Delay Capital Raising in Nepal

Nepal’s recent instability didn’t just disrupt daily trading — it also blocked IPO issuances and delayed the capital-raising process for companies. This blog explores how IPOs were affected, why NEPSE closures hurt investor sentiment, and what this means for Nepal’s capital market.

•
Nepalytix
IPO Pipeline and NEPSE Blocked: How Market Closures Delay Capital Raising in Nepal

Introduction

The Initial Public Offering (IPO) market in Nepal has been one of the busiest in South Asia in recent years, with retail investors rushing to apply for new issues. IPOs are not just an entry point for small investors — they are also a critical source of capital for growing companies.

But during the latest instability, IPO issuance and NEPSE trading both came to a halt. This dual block — of the primary market (IPOs) and the secondary market (NEPSE trading) — highlighted just how vulnerable Nepal’s capital market is to disruptions.

1. IPOs as a Lifeline for Companies and Investors

In Nepal, IPOs have become:

  • A fundraising tool for hydropower, microfinance, and insurance companies.

  • An investment gateway for small investors, as IPOs carry low entry costs (NPR 100 per share).

  • A liquidity driver for the secondary market, as post-listing activity fuels trading volumes.

When IPOs are blocked or delayed, both companies and investors lose.

2. NEPSE Closures and the IPO Pipeline

During the recent two-day closure of NEPSE:

  • Companies scheduled to issue IPOs had to postpone or suspend the process.

  • Capital-raising timelines were delayed, affecting expansion projects.

  • Investors who had applied for IPOs faced uncertainty about allotment and listing.

In the case of Sagar Distillery, its IPO issuance was put on hold citing the unstable environment — a clear reminder that even approved offerings can be stalled.

3. Why IPO Blocks Hurt the Market

  • Investor Frustration: IPOs are seen as safe entry points. Blocking them reduces retail participation.

  • Liquidity Drain: Companies waiting for funds cannot inject new capital into the economy.

  • Confidence Shock: IPO suspensions send negative signals about market stability.

  • Secondary Market Spillover: Without fresh IPO activity, NEPSE’s liquidity cycle weakens further.

4. The Ripple Effect on Companies

Hydropower projects, in particular, rely heavily on IPO capital for construction and expansion. A delay of even a few weeks can:

  • Push back project timelines.

  • Increase financing costs due to interest on loans.

  • Reduce investor appetite for future offerings.

For microfinance and insurance companies, blocked IPOs mean missed opportunities to strengthen balance sheets at a critical time.

5. Investor Sentiment and Confidence

Retail investors are the backbone of Nepal’s IPO boom. For them, IPO suspensions create:

  • Confusion about allotments.

  • Uncertainty about refund timelines.

  • Fear that instability could repeat, making IPOs less reliable.

This erodes one of the biggest strengths of Nepal’s capital market: broad-based retail trust in IPO investing.

6. The Role of Regulators: SEBON and NRB

  • SEBON must provide clear communication when IPOs are suspended to avoid panic.

  • NRB must ensure banking channels process refunds and allotments smoothly even during instability.

  • Both regulators need contingency plans to protect IPO investors in times of disruption.

7. Lessons for the Future

✅ Digital Infrastructure for IPOs
A stronger CDSC system could allow IPO subscriptions and refunds to continue even if NEPSE closes temporarily.

✅ Investor Education
Retail investors need to understand that IPOs carry operational risks, not just allocation risk.

✅ Policy Continuity
Stable policies around IPO issuance will build long-term trust in the capital market.

✅ Alternative Fundraising
Companies should consider rights issues or private placements to reduce overdependence on IPOs.

Conclusion

The blocking of IPOs and NEPSE’s closure revealed a fundamental fragility in Nepal’s capital market. While investors often view IPOs as guaranteed opportunities, the reality is that market infrastructure is still highly vulnerable to external shocks.

For Nepal’s economy to grow, IPOs must remain a stable and trusted channel of capital formation. That requires not just enthusiasm from retail investors but also resilient regulation, strong infrastructure, and transparent communication during times of uncertainty.

Until then, IPOs will remain both the most exciting and the most vulnerable corner of Nepal’s stock market.